With less than 2 months before the final MBBS, final year students are thinking about what order they want to do their HO rotations and in which hospitals. And when it comes to hospitals, all aspects come into play: location, teaching, people to work with, how good it looks on a resume, so on and so forth. One surprising factor that came in are the computerised systems.
It’s now the IT age. Accordingly, the hospitals have moved with the times. The ol’ whiteboard with patients’ info (for staff) in TTSH had given way to two large flat screen panels at the nurses’ counter. The X-ray, CT, MRI films no longer need to be printed out. They can be viewed on the computer monitor with real-life adjustment of views/contrast/brightness. Discharge summaries no longer need to be written out by hand. Patient lab results can be pulled out easily.
With this convenience comes problems, however. Things that are more complicated tend to break down more easily, and the IT upgrades don’t stretch to all areas. For instance, the computers in some of the TTSH MO rooms look (and work) like it’d be an act of mercy to put them down. In some wards in NUH, over half the COWS (Computers on Wheels) are non-functioning. On the whole, however, things have improved.
One thing that stood out in the contrast between hospitals is which system they used for patient information. In the SingHealth cluster (SGH, CGH, KKWCH) it’s from iSoft. For National Healthcare Group (AH, TTSH, NUH), it’s the self-developed Computerised Patient Support System (CPSS). A quick survey of his classmates as well as the members of the current batch of house officers that J. knows revealed that in general, it’s not much of a fight. The vast majority support iSoft. It’s supposedly faster, better designed, easier to use and more pleasing on the eye.
Continue reading →